A note to roofers
Categories:
7 Comments
Leave a comment
Categories
- About /dev/null (94)
- Academia (51)
- Aviation (33)
- Best of teh Web!!1! (141)
- Cars (161)
- 1971 Mercedes 250 (27)
- 1972 Dodge Dart (2)
- 1974 Porsche 914 (25)
- 1976 Ford F-250 (15)
- 1984 Volvo 240 (1)
- 1985 Subaru XT (2)
- 1985 Toyota 4Runner (1)
- 1986 VW Scirocco (7)
- 1991 Eagle Talon (3)
- 1993 BMW 325is (46)
- 1998 Toyota Camry (14)
- 2006 Toyota RAV4 (4)
- Autocrossing (7)
- Autos Articulated (20)
- Collectibles (48)
- LeMay Museum (7)
- Rental cars (10)
- Reviews (16)
- Silly old ads (15)
- Cats (87)
- House (41)
- Moving (1)
- Music (8)
- Nerdiness (206)
- Physical challenges (7)
- Seattle (103)
- Travel (4)
- What's on the TV (91)
- Work (95)
Monthly Archives
- July 2008 (30)
- June 2008 (30)
- May 2008 (31)
- April 2008 (30)
- March 2008 (31)
- February 2008 (29)
- January 2008 (32)
- December 2007 (31)
- November 2007 (33)
- October 2007 (31)
- September 2007 (32)
- August 2007 (32)
- July 2007 (33)
- June 2007 (30)
- May 2007 (33)
- April 2007 (32)
- March 2007 (40)
- February 2007 (30)
- January 2007 (34)
- December 2006 (38)
- November 2006 (35)
- October 2006 (33)
- September 2006 (32)
- August 2006 (32)
- July 2006 (36)
- June 2006 (32)
- May 2006 (33)
- April 2006 (33)
- March 2006 (37)
- February 2006 (42)
- January 2006 (42)
- December 2005 (45)
- November 2005 (48)
- October 2005 (40)
- September 2005 (51)
- August 2005 (35)
- July 2005 (53)
- June 2005 (89)
- May 2005 (99)
- April 2005 (63)
- March 2005 (99)
- February 2005 (109)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by milkman published on March 10, 2007 11:34 AM.
When negotiations go bad was the previous entry in this blog.
And starting all over again is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Wow, is that on the new place?
It's one of the houses we looked at this weekend. And no, we aren't buying that one.
From experience as a roofer and having worked on many houses in other capacities, that is normal. If the nails don't go all the way through, your shingles are much more likely to be torn off in a windstorm. It's supposed to by covered by soffit on the underside so you can't see it there.
Interesting! Does this hold true in regions like Seattle, where the water is far more prevalent than the wind?
A very rough cross section sketch:
http://www.clanspum.net/~jarrod/shingles.png
The black is shingles, the red is tar that comes pre-applied to the shingles and the yellow is where the nails go.
The shingles themselves are waterproof, but the seams are not, but for the stripes of tar. The heat of the sun melts the shingles together a bit, and particularly melts them together at the tar strips. If water is getting in through your shingles, wind/water/ice/etc has already compromised your shingles and some/all need to be replaced. The longer nails thing is only really important during the time it takes for the shingles to melt together or if the tar seals have already failed.
Also, when a roof begins to leak, it is almost always at the seams of the underlying plywood or boards. Leaks through the nail holes are rare.
I just realized I made a mistake on the sketch. The nails go through the middle of a shingle and the top edge of the one below it, meaning there are 2 layers of nailed-down shingle in all places and each shingle (assuming standard size/type) had at least 6 nails holding it down.
Ahh, makes sense—thanks for the info!